Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts

Thursday, March 30, 2023

the waters of Amos, and the ditches of Dante

 But judgment shall be revealed as water, and justice as a mighty torrent. — Amos v. 24. DR

Cleveland Jewish Center in 1920, now Cory Methodist Church 

Amos (fl. 8ᵗʰC. BC) was one of the Twelve Minor Prophets, his day on the Roman Calendar is the 31ˢᵗ of March.  His book is remembered for beauty of language.  Justice, and behaving justly was a major theme.  This image of Justice as flowing water makes for an excellent inscription for fountains.  One such fountain is in Montgomery Alabama from 1989.  Civil Rights Memorial at Southern Poverty Law Center had Maya Lin as the architect.  She is remembered for the Vietnam War Monument in the District of Columbia.  Martin Luther King Jr. knew, and used this verse.  He alluded to it in the “I Have a Dream” speech in 1963. Water is necessary for life, justice is necessary.

But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream. — Amos v. 24. KJV 

Sometimes justice can be viewed in the manner some look at change.  First, by little drabs and drips, then all at once. 

Of course, i bring this up in regards to Orange Caligula. It is so beyond amazing that Cadet Bonespurs has skated away on everything. Donnie the name caller-in-chief is a conman, a grifter, and though very successful at it, Spanky Combover is not adept, nor a smooth bag of fumes and odors. Agolf Twitler is extremely, obnoxiously, loud, and naked in his performance. Trumple-thin-skin is an horrible creature, psychiatrists diagnose him a malignant narcissist. Treason Covefe's chief talent is finding compliant, and evil minions. Comrade Clown's greatest ability in business is to fail, and to cheat everyone, and to live to do so continuously. Circus Peanut Mussolini has had three teachers: his evil father Fred; the political propagandist, anti-Catholic bigot, claptrap gibberish of positive thinking preacher Norman Vincent Peale; and the diabolic, vicious, shyster lawyer Roy Cohn. Here is the most astounding thing, Dolt 45 is stupid, and hjuuuudjlly ignorant. What is his secret? The only thing i can fathom is Cheato Merdalordo is under special protection of the Devil.

Beginning with the XVIIIᵗʰ canto of Dante's Inferno is the eighth circle of Hell——Malebolge, the evil ditches. It is the circle of fraud, and it continues to canto XXX. Infernohas XXXIV cantos. There is much punishment for fraud in Hell. There are ten ditches there, the second part of the first one is for flatterers. Line 116 in XVIII, “vidi un col capo sì di merda lordo, (i saw a head so filthy with shit,)”, and i discern _____.

 
Giovanni Stradano [Jan van der Straet]. The Flatterers. 1587.

Wednesday, April 13, 2022

2022 Miscellany #4—April west side Cleveland

cherry blossoms opened at Brookside Park
Sakura time
porch goose in Easter finery

Česká svobodomyslna škola [Czech freethought school] 
In Chicago, and Cleveland, and some other places there was a lot of immigration from the Austrian Empire. For the Austrians Germanisation and Catholicism went together. Some of the more national spirited Czechs were then estranged from Catholicism, there were degrees. So they divided. Sokols had gymnasiums for athletics. Attached to the hall on Clark was a separate building in 1924. This was in the low west forties along Clark, all the other fotos were taken in Old Brooklyn Cleveland.
Y'no, the wacko woman on Pearl across from the library doesn't like Earth Day. Went to see, whether a new sign was up already. You must certainly know Republicans hate fairness, and love to game the system to their favor. They attack relentlessly. Also spelling is one of the many school subjects they do not respect. Judge O'Connor is trying to follow the law here, and Republicans demand judges to vote only their way. All branches of Ohio state government are controlled by the Republicans. They have super majorities in the legislature. All state wide executives are Republican, and have been for some time. The last redistricting they made gross gerrymandering an abstract art form. The state supreme court has three Democrats, and four Republicans. The Chief Justice, O'Connor, is the only non hyper-partisan Republican in the state involved. Several Repukes want her impeached for this offense. Twice, Ohio voters voted to not allow gerrymandering, of course Republicans are not interested in what the people want.

looking at an owl
 

Saturday, May 15, 2021

Route 33 to Athens

Well, Athens is the only bastion of democracy for many miles around.  I was displeased when my nephew said it was "in the middle of nowhere".  For many people Athens, and Ohio University are synonymous.

It may be 37 years since i was on the stretch between Columbus and Athens on route 33. It has changed. It is high speed four lane all the way. Lancaster, Logan, Nelsonville are invisible.
It is not easy to find free parking, this cardinal was resting on a very computerised meter. NASA had less technology to send men to the moon.
The paw print was the University's logo for years. It is not permitted since the attack cat was commissioned, and phased in from 1996 to 2002. People preferred the paw, but the university payed outsiders for something new. All approved clothing, all university athletic promotion can only have the attack cat. Paw print is prohibited, a private building has a few prints painted anyway.
The dogwoods here are still with their white bracts, and the green leaves have not yet come. In Athens the bracts (and wee flowers) are gone on nearly every tree, and they are fully green leafed. Before, some people followed the northward bloom of the dogwood. The interest began to pique when they bloomed in North Carolina, and then through the Virginias.They are still in bloom in Northern Ohio.

There still are steps on Jeff(erson) Hill. A lot of bricks have been replaced, or covered over. Jeff Hill, the last time i was in town, still had bricks, but bollards were on top and bottom. Athens had/has a lot of old brick with the name of the brickyards it came from. There is a lot of clay in the area. 

Students used to take trays from the cafeteria, to use as sleds in the very few days there was snow. When it was icy, it was humourous, to watch at a distance, cars try to go up. Some would fail, and lose control.

Chris Stain. “Without Labor, Nothing Prospers”. 2015. 

This mural, on Court Street (the main drag uptown), was dedicated for Workers' Memorial Day (April 28) 2018. United Mine Workers Local 1 was in nearby Nelsonville.

   Memorial Auditorium has several plaques from illustrious speakers that visited campus.


I am guessing that last summer, there was some political notice about town concerning the extra-judicial killing of black people. Here are the two sides of a sign planted in 2020.

Breonna Taylor was killed by Louisville Kentucky police March 13. 2020. This storefront window reminds us.
There is a Civil War Monument at the entrance to the College Green since 1893. One of several plaques reads, "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori (Sweet and proper to die for the fatherland)". It was a good place to sit and eat, and smoke.
Guitar man singing on the town's establishment church. Though this area of Ohio was heavily Methodist, the first presidents at Ohio University were Presbyterian ministers.
There used to be Varsity Cinema directly across the Athena, years ago. Covid 19 has been bad for the picture show.
On old 33, Richland Avenue, with the Convocation Center under the clouds.The building was considered a white elephant.

Thursday, February 11, 2021

Guilty! whadya gonna do bout it?

Trump will not be convicted. Trump is not on trial. The Republican Party is on trial. Republican senators will not admit themselves, and their party guilty.
Trump will not be convicted. Trump is not on trial. The Republican Party is on trial. Republican senators will not admit themselves, and their party guilty.
Trump will not be convicted. Trump is not on trial. The Republican Party is on trial. Republican senators will not admit themselves, and their party guilty.
Y'no, years ago the Freemasons realised their membership was continuing to shrink. They commissioned a study to see how they could attract new, young members. The conclusion was that younger men were not very interested in the ceremonies, and other things. Freemasons liked the ceremonies, and other stuff. They would not change, and their membership continues to shrink.

Republicans are not going to change their behaviour. They are what they are, and they like it that way. We will see how their membership holds, of  course they survived Hoover and his Depression, Nixon and his criminality, the utter vileness of Gingrich, the incompetency and mendacity of bush jr, and they still celebrate Reagan's attack on reality and the American way.

Thursday, December 31, 2020

grievance culture

A grievance is a complaint, often at a perceived unfairness or injustice. Sometimes they are justified. But crying for justice is not always appreciated. Some grievances are false. Some people are not interested at hearing any grievance (outside of their own). In slightly coarser language, complaining is called bitching, which is so applied to downgrade the process of any complaint. Truly there are people have suffered great harm and distress, and truly there are people who claim such for every instance of their displeasure over even the slightest matter. 

In a non-genteel occupation i labored in, which is rife with gossip, one fellow complained so often he was nicknamed Bitch; later his son joined the same labor force, and was christened Son of Bitch. Years later, when they were no longer working, and not seen, they were still recalled; and their tale was spread to new workers. 

This year was a very angry year in this country. The chief subject was race. Lyndon Johnson did say,If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.”  He was right then, and is still right. Bernie Sanders, who is class conscious, ran in 2016 and this year always gives economic arguments. It is true, that the wealthy, obscenely wealthy bank on race to camouflage their mercenary greed. To divide and thus conquer the population over racial antagonisms has been a sure winner. Trump was the champion of white grievance.

The chief beneficiary of race hatred to gain political office in this country has been Donald Trump. He began his public 2016 campaign with hatred of Mexican migrants, and he never relented. He began the private campaign in response to Barack Obama, a man of color. Now and always, Donald is a wretched soul. Opposition to Obama was immediate. Soon tea-baggers formed, financed by rich Republican interests, and Fox News [sic]. This ersatz 'populism' appealed sotte voce to racists, and also screaming racial hatred directed at Obama, his wife, and others. With Trump the white racists found their standard bearer, and the grifter Trump would sell standards for them to bear.

Trump was born a rich man, and failed at everything, but being the son of a rich man failure became a success. If we were to put Donnie on the couch, he might remember his first grievance was he was not breast fed enough, if at all. That baby crankiness enveloped him to a mental sickness [krankheit]. Look at him in film, and fotos. He looks the opposite of happy. His smiles are always posed frozenly, and never come to him naturally. His humour exists only in mean-spiritness. He has a near permanent, fish pout.

Trump projects continuously. In April, in Concord N. Hamp., he again told the Scalise (the congressman, not the mobster) story. Scalise was shot, and his wife cried; Trump says a lot of wives wouldn't (his three). Also, for years he has told the snake story, Foolish woman, you knew i was a snake when you took me in.. Trump always talks about himself.

White people, and black people have grievances. Some of both think there are only two people: me, and the other person of the other race. Because you have a grievance, it was not caused by society favoring the other guy against you in every situation. America has angry white people, and angry black people who resent each other. Sometimes it is a turf war (and it should be acknowledged, when a formerly white neighbourhood becomes a black neighbourhood, the white people left behind are often targets of hooliganism, and crime; and this is never described as racially motivated). Other times it are the economic interests manipulating, and playing with people's lives. First look at the numbers. There are many more whites than blacks. Every white man is not set back by advantage to a black man, there are not that many black men. Also, because there are so many white men in spots, not all of them are there because a black man was cheated; there are not that many black men to be cheated.

“...Who renderest the iniquity of the fathers to the children, and to the grandchildren unto the third and fourth generation.” — Exodus 34. vii.
“...who visitest the sins of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation.” — Numbers 14. xviii.
“The past is never dead. It's not even past.” ― William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun

Systemic racism exists. Some white people object to the term, and the idea. The effects of history last far longer than those who propelled them. A hundred years is not much time in history, history lingers. The chief event in American history is the war fought between 1861 and 1865. All those alive then, are dead now. Many in America to-day are not descendants from those in America at the time. That war was fought over black chattel slavery, and yet some people lie about it. The losing side, as Faulkner pointed out, was defeated but unvanquished. The social antagonisms, and classism did not stop. It still exists. Why are people publicly lamenting the confederate war banner? and confederate statues? The Germans do not fly nazi flags, and there are no nazi statues in Germany. Now, some white people resent this, and some black people are permanently angry. There is no collective guilt for future generations. There are lingering effects.

Black Lives Matter is a response to police brutality. Police in America are often given extreme latitude, often to the point of carte blanche. The black population, especially, feels like a captive population. Police have freely killed black people often enough, and without penalty. It is perfectly expected for black people to be upset. The examples of their lives being treated as something without any value is too frequent. One of the cliches, that are so often recited, is that nothing is worth more than a human life. It is not true in America. To this openly, obvious reality the police and their supporters go ballistic. Of course the use of ballistics is part of the problem. Police accept no reproach, and fiercely bristle with anger over criticism. Blue Lives Matter is a nonsense slogan. Black people did not say other lives do not matter, but many people do not value black life. Further, police have created a fiction, in which they are warriors preserving society. And when anger spills into rioting, many people damn the rioters while ignoring the reasons for anger. Police aggression is then positively viewed. Also the slogan “defund the police” was self defeating. Police are a political power in cities, and politicians (especially Republicans) love to use their support, and this year they were part of their campaign language. In Cleveland the police union president, Steve Loomis, in 2016, and later when he was out of office was himself an organiser of Trump events. Loomis is one of 2020's Trump electors.

White privilege is a stupid, and self defeating term. It is not a privilege to be white. Being white is not an extra gift: it even suggests that not being white is existentially inferior, and that truly black lives do not matter. It is often an advantage in America to be white. All white people are not privileged, many suffer the problems other people have. There is a privileged and favored class, and that status is primarily based on wealth. Using the term, white privilege, is meant to be provocative, and is counter productive. When making a plea for justice, to attack people with accusation, and condemnation when they are not those who are your enemies is asinine. 

And there are people who use the complaint of political correctness, as a term for censorship. They are upset of being socially not accepted for saying often rude things. There is also times when the powers in charge do not want to hear views, and they have the situational power to keep people silent. Some of those views silenced are considered politically liberal. Other terms in this realm are call out culture, and cancel culture. And then it also goes for noting lewd behaviour, e.g. slut shaming. Not all grievances carry the same weight, or importance.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

San Diego Chalker


When first i went to school, the very first lesson i learned was:  there are different rules for different people. There is a lot of repetition and review in school. That one lesson was repeatedly demonstrated, and re-inforced.  Schooling is preparation for the outside world. That lesson is continually instructive.

We are innately aware of right and wrong. Back in school, children (pupils) often cry, "that's not fair"; not only when something does not benefit themselves. A good child recognises, and will defend his classmates, for a time. He eventually learns his plea not only can fall on deaf ears, but often on angry wills. He puts himself in jeopardy in speaking out. He learns to be silent, and look the other way. This becomes helpful when he leaves school. There is a power structure in school. Administrators are markedly above teachers, whilst there are teachers that are classroom tyrants (some use the familiar line "I am tough, but fair"), when something (in the eyes of children, at least) is remarkably capriciously onerous, it is the work of administration. Those who gravitate to power, even in a small pond, are wont to overextend and abuse power.
 criminal tools
In San Diego California such an absurd thing has occurred. This time, a jury of his peers saved a man from, possibly years, in prison. A trial began on 26 June, and ended in acquittal on the thirteen charges on the First of July. The supposed crime was chalking messages on public sidewalks, and one private, in front of three Bank of America branches. It should be noted that no banksters were ever charged in the near financial catastrophe that broke in 2008 and led to the largest economic Depression since 1929.

We should know some of the actors in this story: 
  • the defendant, Jeffrey David Olson
  • elected prosecuting attorney, possible mayoral candidate, Jan Goldsmith (do i have to mark R?)
  • presiding judge, Howard Shore (do i have to mark R?)
  • bank security chief, and former San Diego policeman, Darell Freeman
  • Mayor of San Diego, Bob Filner (Democrat)
Some of the alleged 'malicious vandalism' included: "No thanks, big banks", "Shame on Bank of America".

In response to this coming to trial, the mayor's statement was:
This young man is being persecuted for thirteen counts of vandalism stemming from an expression of political protest that involved washable children's chalk on a City sidewalk. It is alleged that he has no previous criminal record. If these assertions are correct, I believe this is a misuse and waste of taxpayer money. It could also be characterized as an abuse of power that infringes on First Amendment particularly when it is arbitrarily applied to some, but not all, similar speech.
This upset the judge. He imposed a gag order on the accused, and the mayor. The prosecutors made a motion to forbid the defense to use such language as: First Amendment, free speech, free expression. The judge agreed.


The bank demanded prosecution. The bank, certainly, had the option to sue in a civil case for damages. Amongst other things, the bank claims it cost $6000 for clean up. I suppose some of my readership may have had bank charges they thought excessive. But in a civil case things about the bank may have been open to discovery, but by using the full power of the state to punish a critic, the bank has the power to deter and crush individuals they find bothersome.

[We are living in an age which used the excuse of Osama bin Laden, and a 'war on terror' to enact measures against civil freedoms. Previous to that there were trade agreements that gave economic entities the power to abrogate laws, including those that protected the public, and the worker. We see government and corporations in league; Mussolini defined that as 'fascism'. Corporations are defining criticism as 'terrorism'. The Supreme Court defined campaign money as free speech. Romney defined corporations as people.]

So the bank had their security officer lobby and press his former comrades in the police department, and had a compliant politician as the prosecutor, and a business 'friendly' judge. So this party coalition of power was arrayed against one private citizen, and malcontent.

The jury decided 'malicious' defacement was not proven. This is good, not only is Mr. Olson free to express his opinions in society, it is further a precedent allowing other people to chalk sidewalks and pavement. If you walk about, you will see a common chalking is done for squares of hopscotch. The children of San Diego, and perhaps all of America, may feel no temerity in the pursuit of this sporting activity. There will not be 'chalk control' against the possession, and the criminalisation of the use, of chalk. We will be able to bear chalk.

I have in the past presented on these pages sidewalk chalkings as art [click, and here, here too]. There are a few comediannes on youtube. One of them did some travel to ...eh...  Londra, Roma, Parigi, San Pietroburgo. She showed a series of images, and would describe them, "art, art, art, ____ art, art, art, ___ art".
Art
Art
Art
Art
Art

Art
Art
Art

Friday, June 21, 2013

jury layoff

 Citizens Jury Wheel. 1931. Cuyahoga County.
Yesterday, i got laid off from jury duty. I work in the trades, and have been laid off many times. At first, it was often insulting...hell, it still is; but i am now more blasé. When it was time to seat the jury, i was glad to be dismissed. The county took 25 people at random, and we were questioned in the 'voir dire', the jury interview. To seat twelve and two alternates, the twenty-third member was the last selection. The process was intrusive. The twenty-five were (presumably) strangers to each other. Everyone opened up in candor to events that were not the business of anyone.

On the elevator going down, i made a comment to the effect of  no one wanted to sit for that trial. One person differed. When we first sat down in the courtroom, the indictment was read, i was quite shocked. One comes and does not know what the case would be, but the rape and abduction of a child is horrible and repulsive, and i was not prepared for such proceedings. And this story won't make the press. Wednesday morning, before eight, a gaggle of media people were on the first floor on my way to the elevators. I asked, who are you here for. One man answered, "Castro".

First the judge (who bore a resemblance to Alec Baldwin) asked questions formed from the questionnaires the potential jurors answered, then the prosecutor, and then the defense attorney. It was alarming, that, several people had personal stories of great misfortune, or that of their close relatives: one man was shot during the theft of his automobile; another was robbed at gunpoint twice by different pre-teen children in New Orleans; a woman and her daughter were robbed, also under gunpoint, in Chicago; a woman's son was murdered at Marine boot camp (Camp Lejeune); a man witnessed a college roommate killed in Kent... 

It was also surprising, that, the three interrogators were acquaintanced with family members of the potential jurors. Two people were teachers/counselors that were questioned concerning students with sexual abuse. Three people had police relatives. One was a lawyer in a child related services. The thought crossed my mind, more potential jurors than twenty-five might be called. Several of those people were rejected from the impaneling. Eleven of us came Wednesday morning for jury duty, and Thursday afternoon it was over, and it was also over for other Wednesday jurors who were uninvolved in a case.
Isamu Noguchi sculpture. 1976. [click for another view]

Friday, March 22, 2013

license to kill

I have seen yard signs, and billboards concerning Dan Ficker. Without knowing anything about him, i see he has family and friends whom care about him. If he had a song writing friend, perhaps a murder ballade would have been written and sung. Here is the important point: he was home, in his house in Parma, and two Cleveland policemen (one on duty) came, beat him, shocked him with an electric pistol, and then shot him dead. The police are free.
The '143' is  a code for the number of letters, in each word in the phrase 'i love you'.  Dan Ficker used to sign e-mails with that tag. I do not know whose this car is on. It is a public plea for justice. It is also an invite for police harassment. Police do not care for anything that challenges them.

There was a 1967 Dragnet episode, The Shooting Board, where Joe Friday was examined by a Board of Inquiry over a possible manslaughter accusation. Television as it was, and the programme as it was, was always go to be in favor of the Los Angeles Police Department and Sgt. Joe Friday. But in one scene, Friday's superior calls him in and asks to see his badge. The captain details the creation of the board, and how just the department is towards the public. He waxes poetic over the value of the metal. He says, "it is not a hunting license". Of course, Friday is cleared, but an assurance of proper cop behaviour would always be maintained. Well, that can always be done if it is scripted, and filmed so.

Now, Ficker was a white man. Since then, Cleveland has had a far more bold and public police killing, but of two black people after a spectacular automobile posse on 29 November 2012. The investigations are continuing, and it has taken some time for the 'feds' to become interested.

Click on these stories while they are available for the details:
deadly police shooting of Parma man
http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/bcishootingreport
Cleveland police chase and shooting portrayed as chaotic scene
Police union chief defends officers
13 Cleveland police officers who fired 137 rounds
killing two people following a chase Thursday night
union president calls for Chief Michael McGrath's resignation
This is the oddest of the stories, Michael DeWine (R) Ohio Attorney General (the same Repuke who as Senator acted as a prosecutor of President Clinton) wants to clear the cops and blames 'the system', "The system itself failed these officers". He is handing it over to the new Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, whom as a judge prided himself on coming down hard, being tough. The game is simple: the cops, and the courts are tight. McGinty's grand jury will not be aggressive. But there may be a corrective.
Justice Department may review 2011 shooting
Cleveland police under investigation by U.S. Justice
Full Review of Cleveland Police

When this story broke, i was surprised it didn't go national immediately. Then again this is neither Los Angeles, nor New York, nor Chicago. The outline of facts are amazing. Pursuit policy was completely ignored. Several police agencies* were involved, only Cleveland cops fired. Thirteen cops fired 137 rounds. One cop emptied his gun three times, could he not see the corpses dancing from the concussions? He was an Iraqui veteran, who claims never to have fired in combat, but was scared to death while emptying his gun into the car repeatedly. Now, the cop on video is interviewed and tells how scared he is. Some fine acting is also done on camera by others. "Even through Iraq, I never fired my weapon. I never have been so afraid in my life." He shot forty-nine times.

What surprised me, is why did they not just plant a gun (it would have made everything more plausible)? The cops still speak of the incident with the dead firing a non existent weapon. How did this happen?  Two Negroes in an old car (1979 Chevy Malibu) downtown were driving, and the junker backfired. The cops JUMP to the conclusion that a shot was fired, and the cop cars emerge from everywhere to take down these two people.  Statement after statement cops made concerning the incident as it was happening, was incorrect.

When the news first hits the public, the police chief is actually dismayed. This does not go over well with the force. The police union calls for his resignation on camera. It is extremely rare, to the point of being an uniquity, for the local press to air such a statement by a union president (or union member) against his job superior, or for that matter any executive authority figure in town by anyone. But the police have their absolute defenders in exercising authority and force, even amongst those whom criticised cops and other public union workers protesting against anti-collective bargaining.

I have always been in awe of whoever is the union chief for the Cleveland cops. Jeff Follmer is in this audacious mold, the only statement he has not made (at least publicly) is for the families of the dead to pick up the cost that any cop had in the process of the killings (bullets, dry cleaning-- or perhaps the city covers that). They defend their members one hundred percent (some unions only explain management's position instead of defending the member). Every possible defense that someone uses to defend themselves against charges, no matter how ridiculous, the cops use on the behalf of their own. Defenses that would get no play in court, or towards a cop, are accepted when a cop uses them. Evidence, logic, law mean absolutely nothing. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Cop always right, non cop always wrong. Easy, no thought required. Or put this in cop talk, cops = good guys, anyone who gets in the way = bad guys. 
____________________________
*"Surveillance videos obtained along the pursuit route depict that at one point, a minimum of 62 police vehicles were in pursuit or following along the pursuit route. These vehicles included marked and unmarked Cleveland Police Department vehicles, with Ohio State Highway Patrol troopers, Cuyahoga County Sheriff deputies, Bratenahl Police Department officers and officers of the RTA Police Department peripherally involved." pg. 53 of 65.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

26th Sunday in Ordinary Time B

For those who use the new lectionary, we have some interesting readings for Sunday. The Old Testament reading is from the Books of Moses. Josue was jealous for Moses' sake. Two men, Eldad and Medad, were prophesying. This did not trouble Moses. The Gospel reading has Marcus quoting Jesus, "And whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the sea."* If the homilist was willing, he could be very anti-clerical. The church police would be very offended (scandalised).

The Epistle reading is from the first of the Catholic Epistles, James, the book Luther could not tolerate.
1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl in your miseries, which shall come upon you. 2 Your riches are corrupted: and your garments are motheaten. 3 Your gold and silver is cankered: and the rust of them shall be for a testimony against you, and shall eat your flesh like fire. You have stored up to yourselves wrath against the last days. 4 Behold the hire of the labourers, who have reaped down your fields, which by fraud has been kept back by you, crieth: and the cry of them hath entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth. 5 You have feasted upon earth: and in riotousness you have nourished your hearts, in the day of slaughter. 6 You have condemned and put to death the Just One, and he resisted you not.
The fourth verse, i have written on one of my tool boxes. It has been retouched whenever the marker ink wears off. It has been there almost twenty years. There are four sins that cry out to heaven for divine justice (murder, sodomy, defrauding labour, cruelty to widows and orphans). The Jacobean verse is not in isolation, when Moses the Lawgiver spoke for God, he also did say, "But thou shalt pay him the price of his labour the same day, before the going down of the sun, because he is poor, and with it maintaineth his life: lest he cry against thee to the Lord, and it be reputed to thee for a sin."
I have always understood Jesus to be the Friend of labour:
Come to me, all you that labour, and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take up my yoke upon you, and learn of me, because I am meek, and humble of heart: and you shall find rest to your souls. For my yoke is sweet and my burden light.—Matthew xi. 28-30

There are several such passages in the Bible. The words of the prophets were not enjoyed by all. Jesus was a trouble maker in the eyes of the Pharisees. Some rich, and powerful people go to church. Do they hear these words? Would they quote these words on the campaign trail? You know not in the boardroom.

Whoever is the lector in church that reads these words, read them loud, clear, slow enough, and with feeling, so they will be heard by the congregation. Some listeners may be agitated, they will be like the proverbial "nervous whore in church". And if anyone contradicts these words moments after, pray the congregation notices the discrepancy.
________________
*That was the Douay-Rheims version. In the US, currently the NAB is read, "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck and he were thrown into the sea." The Latin has 'scandalizaverit' (tempt to evil; cause to stumble).

nota bene: About bishops and other Catholic Republicans: party platforms are propaganda documents to satisfy noisy, pushy people in the party. The public does not read these, and they are not binding. Previous action by parties and politicians are a real guide to future action.  Did the Republican party say in their 2000 platform, "We will steal this election, start expensive and unnecessary wars based on lies, increase national debt, and make the rich richer, and the poor poorer, and do everything we can to hold on to and gain power"?

The propagandist that came up with "intrinsic evil" versus "prudential judgments" is a casuistic prevaricator. We know what you mean by the first, and it has become the status quo, and it is a false political issue to divert us from other issues. It is tangentially a political issue. It makes for much noise, motivates some people, is a good fraud to pull on people and to see nothing change.  The second one says, sinisterly, cynically, perversely, banefully, "Yes we know what is right, you know what is right, but if you say something else is right (and we know it is wrong), and do what is wrong, we will not interfere." It would be so nice if Republican bishops were to read the Bible and the doctors instead of shilling for the moneyed establishment. Make you a prudential judgment, when you weigh such words from such men.

The episcopal scrupulosity about clerical misbehaviour is not as stringent. "And whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the sea."
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
postscriptum:  There is at least one internet petition calling for the resignation of such a bishop:

Petitioning President, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
This petition will be delivered to:
His Eminence Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan President, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops     Most Reverend Joseph E. Kurtz Vice President, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops     Rebecca Summers Dir. of Communications - Diocese KCSJ
Bishop Robert Finn Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City - St. Joseph, MO     Bishop R. Daniel Conlon Chairman, USCCB Committee on Child Protection    
Bishop Robert Finn: Resign as Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City - St. Joseph, MO.

by Jeff Weis
Kansas City, MO

Bishop Robert Finn is head of the Catholic Church in the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph. He is also the highest-ranking U.S. Catholic cleric to be convicted in a decades-long child sexual abuse scandal.

In September of 2012, a judge found Bishop Finn guilty on one misdemeanor charge after he failed to report a priest who had taken or possessed hundreds of pornographic pictures of young girls. Even though Finn was found guilty in a court of law, he remains the Bishop of the Kansas City – St. Joseph Diocese. Now, many members of our community feel he is unfit to lead and should resign. He is currently the highest-ranking U.S. Catholic cleric to be convicted in a decades-long child sexual abuse scandal.

This isn’t a new problem. Only three years ago, Bishop Finn settled lawsuits with 47 plaintiffs in sexual abuse cases for $10 million and agreed to a long list of preventive measures, among them to immediately report anyone suspected of being a pedophile to law enforcement authorities.

I’m from Kansas City, MO - born and raised Catholic in the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph. As a Catholic, I believe in forgiveness. But I also believe that forgiveness and change can exist together and that’s why I feel it’s necessary for Bishop Finn to immediately resign. The spiritual, emotional, and moral pain that this issue has caused to Finn’s fellow clergymen, diocesan employees, volunteers, parishioners and faithful must begin to come to an end.

Begin the healing by resigning.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Why Saul Alinsky is loathed

The germ of this essay was the recent fixation the repukes, and other tinfoil teabaggers have concerning Saul Alinsky*1909, 1972†. It has to have been recent, probably not before the presidential candidacy of Obama*1961[do the math], and probably not well known in those circles until well after the inauguration. The formation of the teabaggers came at this time.

Alinsky was a sociologist of the Chicago School. He studied the organising of John L. Lewis of the miner’s union, and the C.I.O.. He grew up as a religious jew. He worried that his folks wanted him to be a rabbi.
Alinsky became an agnostic, but he maintained, “Whenever anyone asks me my religion, I always say—and always will say— Jewish.”

Alinsky had several distinguished catholic friends. There were leftists who called him a catholic dupe. Alinsky believed in community organising. Alinsky was a member of the non-socialist ‘left’. This concept is unfathomable to the idjits, i have referred to earlier.

After a little study, i have come to the conclusion, that, the only rationale [other than defamation of individuals, primarily a legitimate President] they have is an intense fear about community organising, itself, so that poverty and powerlessness does NOT decrease. Somewhere along the line some fascist propagandist came to the notice of a media mouthfoamer, or two, and that created this hatred for Alinsky. It was picked up by their mindless minions, and when you hear one parrot, you have heard them all [i may be exaggerating, but not by much].

The Diocese of Davenport, Iowa, [and later with some other Davenport institutions] has given a Pacem in Terris Freedom Award. Pacem in Terris was the name of an encyclical of John XXIII, its subtitle is, On Establishing Universal Peace in Truth, Justice, Charity and Liberty. It was his last, but the first one addressed to “all men of good will”. Its first recipient was the murdered president John Kennedy (1964). Alinsky was awarded the prise in 1969 because he “taught people how to organize and to act together in promoting justice in society”. Other recipients included M.L. King (1965), Mother Teresa (1976), Joseph Bernardin (1985), Desmond Tutu (1987), César Chávez (1992), Lech Wałęsa (2001).

It is doubtful many of his detractors read him. Some say he loved Lucifer. Okay, this is crazy bullshit. Then i heard, an intelligent man say Alinsky had Lucifer as his hero. Then it hit me. John Milton made Lucifer(Satan) an hero. Now, Milton was a puritan, he was with Oliver Cromwell. Milton was anti-catholic, but this made him think he was a real christian. Milton wrote the book length poem, “Paradise Lost”, in which Satan is the hero. Now, christian teaching has the sin of pride causing the fall of Lucifer. This rebellion makes Satan heroic [read the poem, or see this].

Now, i argued with a young english teacher, who had been raised catholic. I argued that Judas was the first protestant [in refusing to believe in the Sacrament]. Luther followed in Lucifers footfalls [Luther in breaking unity, and acting on his egoism] in the primacy of will. This upset him, and he said that i just misused Milton to attack the Reformation. So i figured, Alinsky had to make some sort of luciferian rebel image; and from this the repukes created their misleading canard.

In the book,
Rules for Radicals, before the table of contents there is quoted, Rabbi Hillel, Thomas Paine [no surprise], and Alinsky. Alinsky makes an acknowledgement that Lucifer was the first radical, and this is [of course] exactly in the Miltonian mode; not unlike John Steinbeck using a passage from that poem to title his book about an agricultural strike, “In Dubious Battle” (1936). Alinsky quotes from the Book of Job, a few pages later, at the very beginning of the book proper, on page 3; but a repuke might not get that far. He already has more than enough to damn Alinsky.
______________________
“The life of man upon earth is a warfare...”
—Job vii. 1 [Douay Rheims 1609, or Douay Rheims Challoner 1750]. This was the newest english catholic version until 1936 when the Westminster Version was completed. Now for the Church in England and Wales the Jerusalem Bible (1966), for the Church in the US New American Bible (1970) are used liturgically. Whether Alinsky quoted for the choice of words, or not, i dont know, but he didnt use a jewish, or protestant translation; he used the ancient catholic one, which was the only really readily available one in his time.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Karma and dharna beg justice

For what things a man shall sow, those also shall he reap. For he that soweth in his flesh, of the flesh also shall reap corruption. But he that soweth in the spirit, of the spirit shall reap life everlasting. — Galatians vi.8.

Is karma destiny? There is not only one view in the theologies and philosophies from India. Karma is the word for 'action', 'deed' or 'act'. It is the logic of simple physics. There is cause and effect. Actions have karmic effects. We have similar colloquial advice and commentary: "what goes around comes around", "payback is a bitch". The concept is not only tied to the transmigration of the soul, or the conditions of the afterlife.

A realist, not blinded by optimism, sees some consequences tied to some actions; but he does not see a quid pro quo, or an ultimate balance, justice. A moral man, one who might be described as having a fear of God, feels compelled to do right action. Another man, will do what he will without regard to cosmic justice or good karma. Whether he skates, or has things blow up in his face remains to be seen.

Another indian concept is dharna. Dharna is an attempt to gain justice or payment. The form it took was the plaintiff would sit at the entrance of the offender's home, or business, and wait, wait continuously till he got his justice, or died waiting for it. This is a genesis of the peaceful protest that had Gandhi and millions sit on the doorstep of the british empire. "We shall not be moved" is a stand for justice. Occupations of property are attempts to obtain justice. It is an attempt to shame people to do right. Centuries ago, the transgressor or the debtor had a fear, that this implacable soul would haunt his conscience, or being, for all time. The fasting until death at a doorstep was put in play creating a spirit that could not be appealed to--an unforgiving perpetual ghost.

Not everyone is capable of being shamed. In India in 1919, General Dyer had thousands killed in a peaceful demonstration at Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar.

Peaceful protest while being stoically gallant, and noble, does not always succeed. Some have no ruth, no mercy, no humanity to appeal to. In other protests people have said, "God is watching". Some still don't care. In the movie, The Fugitive, Harrison Ford yells at Tommy Lee Jones "I'm innocent!". His reply is, "I don't care!".

Friday, September 17, 2010

Labor Priests

Now, there used to be a breed of priests that were heavily involved in social issues. They would be marching for civil rights, peace, and other social issues. There were also 'labor priests'. The drama of their parishioners lives would draw them into activism in order to care pastorally for their flock. We need more of them. To-day's America forgets that many jobs involving physical labor are dirty and dangerous, because few deaths and physical hardships happen in offices. In many of these jobs there are present dangers, that, could be alleviated, and the wages and benefits improved. Some priests realised.

Father James Renshaw Cox *1886, †1951, was from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, In January 1932 Fr. Cox came with 25,000 jobless Pennsylvanians to Washington, D.C. It was the largest such demonstration, up to that time, in the capital. President Herbert Hoover was not pleased, and had Cox investigated to see if it was a Catholic plot on the government.

Msgr. Charles Owen Rice *1908, †2005, also from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for many years wrote for the diocesan newspaper, and presented a radio programme on two local stations. Msgr. Rice gave the invocation at the founding of the C.I.O (Congress of Industrial Organizations) in 1938.

Msgr. George Gilmary Higgins *1916, †2002 from Chicago, for many years wrote the bishops' annual Labor Day message. From 1945 to 2001 he wrote "The Yardstick," a column, often on labor and other issues of justice. From 1951 he wrote about farm workers; and he became a friend of the UFW and Cesar Chavez. He considered his labor work as a 'ministry of presence'.

Msgr. Higgins was a peritus (expert) during Vatican II, and worked with Father John Courtney Murray on the Declaration on Religious Freedom. He worked with the UAW. He became a friend of Lech Wałesa as he was a liaison between Solidarność and american unions.

There were others: Fr. Martin B. Mangan *1929, †2001 of Decatur, Illinois; Edward F. Boyle S.J. *1931, †2007 the Executive Secretary of the Labor Guild of the Boston Archdiocese, Msgr. John J. Egan *1916,2001 of Chicago.

The only one to be fictionalised was Father John “Pete” Corridan, S.J. *1911, †1984. The Jesuits of Manhattan were involved on the docks of New York City, and New Jersey. This was two generations before. Before the large steel trailers, when much more physical, manual labor needed to be done. The cargo had to be unloaded, broken down, and loaded again, from trains and ships to ships and barges. The International Longshoremen's Association (ILA), in NYC in the '30s, '40s and '50s was a crooked union. The incest between company officials (sometimes mobsters) and their agents, union officers, and politicians was rife. Any union and that cut deals that does not benefit their members is run by Judases. An alternative clean democratic union was needed, even with Corridan's well known efforts, such a union was not to be certified by the rank and file.

Father Corridan spoke to Malcolm Johnson, a reporter for the New York Sun. The articles won a Pulitzer in 1949. Corridan said, "Men are hired as if they were beasts of burden, part of the slave market of a pagan era."

Budd Shulberg wrote the screenplay, On the Waterfront, which won Academy Awards in 1954. The 'Waterfront Priest' that Karl Malden †2009 would play in the movie as Fr. Pete Barry was Fr. Corridan. Malden would give the lines, "Christ is on the waterfront" over a dead longshoreman.
...It's forgetting that every fellow down here is your brother in Christ. But remember, Christ is always with you - Christ is in the shape up*. He's in the hatch. He's in the union hall. ...
___________
*shape up is the line up and selection of men out of a group for that day's work